Hiring doesn’t end at offer acceptance. Starred helps TA teams understand which hires succeed, where hiring decisions break down and how to continuously improve hiring quality.
.jpeg)
Join teams building long-term hiring success
Resumes and interviews only tell part of the story. What happens after also defines the hiring quality.
Most TA teams lack visibility into patterns that lead to successful long-term hires.
Poor hiring decisions impact retention, productivity, and team performance long after onboarding.
Strong hiring decisions depend on consistent evaluation and collaboration across the hiring team.
.jpeg)
Hiring quality is hard to improve when nobody measures it the same way.
.jpeg)
Define what a good hire looks like and make it easy to repeat.
.jpeg)
Having a feedback loop means little if it never impacts real hiring decisions.
.jpeg)
Don’t let mis-hires cost you productivity, time and money.
Companies across the globe use Starred to improve candidate experience and business results, from building trust in the process to attracting and hiring top talent.
See which interviewer habits, hiring signals and candidate sources actually lead to strong long-term hires.
No more relying on gut feeling. Starred gives TA teams the data and confidence they need to guarantee the best hires.


Bring together signals form hiring managers and their new hires to see the full picture that leads to successful hires.
Quickly understand what impacts hiring quality and spot gaps across the hiring journey before they become problems.
See how Starred helps TA teams measure Quality of Hire the right way.
Measuring Quality of Hire can raise a lot of questions. These are the ones TA leaders ask us most often.
That's true, and it's one of the reasons Quality of Hire has been so difficult to standardize. Starred gives you a proven framework built on research, while still letting you adapt it to what success looks like in your business. The goal is to give you a consistent way to measure, improve hiring quality over time and benchmark against internally and against industry peers.
Yes, and that's often where the most useful conversations start. Looking at one overall Quality of Hire score can hide important differences. Starred helps you compare hiring quality across teams, departments and hiring managers, making it easier to spot what best teams are doing differently.
Hiring teams are often asked to prove the value of their decisions without having much evidence beyond time-to-fill or hiring volume. Starred’s Quality of Hire module gives TA a way to talk about business outcomes and show how hiring decisions contribute to longer-term business outcomes.
Starred shows the patterns across successful hires, making it easier to understand which decisions are consistently leading to better outcomes instead of relying on individual success stories. By connecting hiring process data with post-hire outcomes, you can see which interview stages, hiring practices or sourcing decisions consistently lead to stronger hires and which ones don't.
Looking back is useful, but it rarely changes future hiring unless the learning becomes part of the process. By the time someone has been in the role for six months, it's hard to remember what stood out during interviews or why a particular candidate felt like the right choice. Starred helps teams capture those signals consistently, so they can improve hiring decisions instead of relying on memory or isolated discussions
Recruiters spend months finding the right person, but rarely get structured feedback on whether their hiring decisions worked out months later. Starred closes that loop by connecting post-hire outcomes back to the hiring process, gathering data both from candidates and hiring managers. Over time, recruiters begin to see which approaches consistently lead to stronger outcomes and which ones deserve another look.